5/27/2023 0 Comments The strings theory an hypothesis![]() However, string theory is definitely already useful for scientists, as it has triggered the developments of many new pieces of mathematics on its own, some of which are not pure game of thoughts, as illustrated by the recent calculations related to high temperature superconductivity, or holographic models of QCD (for instance). For instance, it might be some day that string theory has finalized the reformulation of the standard model of particle physics, but has not allowed for new experimentally testable predictions (not in principle, but in practice). It can not make any NEW prediction (yet). It's not valid as a theory because it does not make predictions. I'm just eager to know if string theory is not science and if it is religion. Well obviously you can break the same superset down into any set you want and say something is in a different set than something else, but.so? I guess I don't understand your point. What are the different reasons for ID and String Theory not making predictions? I don't see how it detracts at all from the main argument. You'll have to explain how this is a red herring. Many people call string theory religion or at the very least philosophy. String theory and ID both belong to the same superset: 'things that are not theories because they do not make predictions', but that does not mean string theory and ID are themselves the same set. While true, ID also does not make predictions, it is for a different reason. The entire religion argument of yours is a red herring. They're saying it's not valid as a theory because it does not make predictions. I don't think anyone is suggesting the string theory is religion. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |